STOLEN VA RECORDS



Dear Military.com Member,

As you may know, data was stolen from the Department of Veterans Affairs. This data contained identifying information on up to 26.5 million veterans and spouses, including names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth and some disability ratings.

At this time, we encourage you to be vigilant and monitor your financial accounts to protect yourself against identity theft. We have put together the following information to help you:

Read the latest from the Department of Veteran Affairs

Important FAQs

Dear Friends,

I personally agree with what this petition says, and I think you might agree, too.  If you can spare a moment, please take a look, and consider signing yourself.  Please Help our POW Families find their loved ones. 
 
I have just read and signed the online petition: "Vietnam, it's time to move" hosted on the web by PetitionOnline.com, the free online petition service, at: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/vnpowmia/

Best wishes, Bill Auerbach

The following was forwarded from Larry Stephenson:

ATTENTION VIETNAM VETERANS

Get a FREE copy of the documentary film

AGENT ORANGE: THE LAST BATTLE

Go to the site below and let them know
you would like the free DVD sent to you.

www.agentorangefilm.com
 

VA News Release:

VA To Grant Benefits To More Vietnam Veterans

Based upon a recently released review of scientific studies, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Anthony J. Principi has decided to extend benefits to Vietnam veterans with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

"Compelling evidence has emerged within the scientific community that exposure to herbicides such as Agent Orange is associated with CLL," Principi said. "I'm exercising my legal authority to ensure the full range of VA benefits is available to Vietnam veterans with CLL."

The ruling means that veterans with CLL who served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War don't have to prove that illness is related to their military service to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs disability compensation. Additionally, for more than 20 years, VA has offered special access to medical care to Vietnam veterans with any health problems that may have resulted from Agent Orange exposure, and this decision will ensure higher-priority access to care in the future.

The decision to provide compensation was based upon a recent report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that found among scientific studies "sufficient evidence of an association" between exposure to herbicides during the Vietnam War and CLL.

The IOM review, conducted at VA's request, was the latest in a series spanning the period since 1993 when the independent, non-governmental agency first published a report for VA that examined thousands of relevant scientific studies on the health effects of various substances to which American servicemembers may have been exposed in Vietnam.

"On the modern battlefield, not all injuries are caused by shrapnel and bullets," Principi said. "This latest IOM study and my decision to act upon it are the latest examples of VA's continuing efforts to care for the needs of our combat veterans."

VA requested the IOM panel of experts to focus on CLL in their report because of veterans' concerns that CLL shares some similarities with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which the IOM had previously connected to Agent Orange exposure.

Principi ordered the development of regulations to enable VA to begin paying compensation benefits once a final rule takes effect. Publication of that regulation is expected in the near future. VA will publish further details, when available, on its Web site at http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/benefits/herbicide/.

In the meantime, veterans with questions about health-care, compensation and survivor benefits may call a toll-free help line at 1-800-749-8387 for information. VA also encourages Vietnam veterans who have not done so to request a subscription to Agent Orange Review, VA's free newsletter that will keep them abreast of developments on this issue and other policies and scientific findings in the future.

Newsletter subscription information is available from the help line number above. Back issues and additional information about Agent Orange are available at another VA Web site at http://www.va.gov/agentorange/.

 


Hey Guys,

I would like to start a data base of the members but I need your help.  Will need you to send me your info: name; rank when serving with 7-8FA; dor; mos; date served; bped; home town; home state; present complete address; phone number; age; rank at retirement.  You may add: spouse name; childrens names; and if you have any, grandchildren or great grandchildren.

I've been in touch with a friend of mine that keeps the data base for another unit and he said it may take years to get it together, but we have to start sometime, so why not now.

I will start searching for other members and if you will help by sending me any orders you have from the 7-8FA it will help id other members.  If you know anyone that was a member have them contact me by email or by phone: 325-646-5066.

Hope you will be willing to help.

Thanks,  George
automatic8@hotmail.com
 


I just got a new issue of "Agent Orange Review"  from the VA    If you didn't get one  check out 
 
http://www1.va.gov/agentorange/page.cfm?pg=1  
 
this is an index of the issues on the internet. 
 
..........Dennis Heidbreder

Stress of battle haunts soldiers

By Brian Bowling
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Wednesday, February 23, 2005

 

Thousands of war-hardened Pennsylvania soldiers might face their toughest battles when they return to civilian life.

Most of those who survive combat do so without developing mental problems, but a significant percentage suffers post-traumatic stress disorder or other mental problems. If history is any guide, as many as a third of combat veterans could need help, a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs official said.

Daniel Ziff, clinical coordinator of the post-traumatic stress disorder team for the VA's Pittsburgh Healthcare System, said about a third of Vietnam War veterans developed mental disorders. Because of comparable battle conditions, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have the potential to cause similar problems, he said.

"You can never relax. Any car that drives by can be a bomb," Ziff said. "You don't know who the enemy is, where they are."

At least 9,000 Pennsylvania National Guard and Reserve soldiers have seen actual combat in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to the Pentagon. More than 26,000 active, Guard and Reserve soldiers from Pennsylvania have served in one or both areas in some capacity.

A mental health study published last July in the New England Journal of Medicine found that 15 percent to 17 percent of the Iraq veterans and 11 percent of the Afghanistan veterans exhibited signs of major depression, generalized anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder within three to four months of returning home.

The study attributed the higher rate of symptoms among Iraq veterans to the fact that a higher percentage of those veterans were involved in combat.

The study was conducted by Dr. Charles Hoge and others at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring, Md.

Perry Bishop, spokesman for the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, said the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder usually appear between three months and several years after a soldier returns home.

The Vietnam veterans' figure came from studies done years after the veterans returned, and it's too soon to come up with comparable numbers for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, he said.

"It's not a trackable number like bullet wounds," Bishop said.

Feeling of helplessness

Rachel Yehuda, a psychiatry professor and director of the Traumatic Stress Studies Division at the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine in New York City and the Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, said modern diagnosis and treatment won't reduce the number of cases but could keep those soldiers from developing long-term problems the way many Vietnam veterans did.

"People who are exposed to combat trauma can be helped if we do it at the right time," she said.

Randall Marshall, associate professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University, is part of a team that is reanalyzing the Vietnam War veteran data on post-traumatic stress disorder. He said it's important to be clear about what groups of soldiers -- particularly combat versus non-combat troops -- are under consideration when determining a rate.

"You don't want to start saying that 30 percent of everyone who served in the military is going to develop PTSD," he said.

While training could reduce the number of combat veterans who suffer the initial stages of the disorder, the main goal of treatment now is to reduce the number who suffer long-term.

"You could say fairly that 20 to 30 percent of (Vietnam) vets who saw heavy combat had PTSD for months to years after," Marshall said.

Ziff said a common factor between Vietnam and Iraq is the "unconventional" nature of the combat.

In conventional combat, enemy troops wear identifiable uniforms and the fighting occurs along a definable battle front. In Iraq and Afghanistan, however, friend and foe might dress alike and fighting can erupt anywhere and at anytime, making soldiers feel less in control, he said.

Post-traumatic stress disorder is "based upon a perception of helplessness," Ziff said.

'Just being bait'

Jason Brosk, 28, of Penn Hills, knows that feeling.

As a captain leading a platoon of infantry scouts with the Army's 101st Airborne Division, he advanced on Najaf, Iraq, on March 30, 2003, with a clear set of orders -- capture or kill any Iraqi holding a weapon.

"I wasn't really worried about much," Brosk said.

Four days later, after the city fell, "everything starts getting gray," he said.

Instead of scouting ahead of the main battle group, Brosk's men were checking farmers' harvest licenses, manning checkpoints and watching for homemade bombs, which the military refers to as IEDs -- improvised explosive devices.

Most difficult of all, they separated friends from enemies by waiting to see who attacked them.

"We're just being bait," he said.

Public acceptance

Marshall and Ziff said a key factor that should reduce the long-term rate of post-traumatic stress disorder for the most recent groups of combat veterans is public acceptance. While some people are protesting the Iraq War, the protests are mainly aimed at the Bush administration rather than the military.

Vietnam veterans, by contrast, often found themselves directly blamed for that war, Ziff said. Faced with such public disapproval, they were even more reluctant than most combat veterans to seek help or discuss their combat experiences.

"They went underground," Ziff said. "It caused them to suppress their feelings even further."

Mt. Sinai's Yehuda said one of the main barriers to reducing the number of veterans with long-term mental problems is the reluctance of people to seek mental help because of the social stigma attached to it. Another is the perception that most such problems will resolve themselves.

"In fact, time only heals some wounds," Yehuda said. "Even if time is going to heal your wound, you're not going to be harmed by checking into the VA or checking with a mental health worker."

Ideally, veterans should view a visit to a counselor the same way they would a medical checkup.

"It's not just for people who can't cope," Yehuda said.

Bishop said the Defense Department has learned since Vietnam that many veterans won't voluntarily seek help. The department's health services program has already performed one sweep of one-on-one interviews with Iraq War veterans and is preparing to do another, he said.

Brosk now works for Veterans Affairs as an outreach counseling technician at the McKeesport Veterans Center in White Oak.

Veterans Affairs believes early treatment of veterans will keep initial readjustment problems from developing into persistent mental disorders, Brosk said.

"If we can talk to them a couple of months after they come home, we can help them get through it," he said


Veterans complain of skimpy funding in Bush's budget plan

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

By Ann McFeatters, Post-Gazette National Bureau
 

WASHINGTON -- Alfred J. Casey, 82, of White Oak, is a news junkie. Every day he reads newspapers, watches TV and devours magazines. And ever since he read about the president's proposed budget earlier this month, he's been stewing.

"I think this administration is cutting money from the veterans, and that will hurt a lot of people in Pittsburgh," said Casey, who served in the Ardennes in France in World War II. "A lot of veterans are in bad shape healthwise. A lot of people in this country forget that besides those who don't come back, many come back needing help for the rest of their lives."

Jim Nicholson, President Bush's new Veterans Affairs secretary, rejects the idea that the Bush administration has forgotten the nation's 25 million veterans.

"This budget proposal guarantees that the department will be able to care for those veterans who count on VA the most," Nicholson said. He said that in an austerity budget Bush is proposing a 2.7 percent increase in spending on discretionary programs for veterans.

But what Nicholson omitted was that Bush's budget also proposes that veterans pay more for their health care and that he's seeking less for veterans' health care than every major veterans' advocacy group says is essential.

The Bush budget would impose a new $250 health care user fee on what it calls well-to-do veterans who use services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and it also would double prescription drug co-payments to $15. But in many cases, those criteria could include veterans with annual incomes of only $26,000.

The administration's proposal would boost spending on veterans' health care by $111 million.

But veterans' groups say that is only one-fourth of 1 percent more than the fiscal year 2005 budget and that government experts have said the VA needs a 14 percent increase to keep up with its needs.

Advocacy groups (including the Paralyzed Veterans of America, Disabled American Veterans, Veterans of Foreign Wars and AMVETS) say a realistic budget next year for veterans' health care should be $31.2 billion -- not $28.1 billion, as the president's budget proposes.

In testimony before the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, Richard Fuller, legislative director for the Paralyzed Veterans of America, said the administration's proposed budget for fiscal year 2006 will not improve health care for the nation's veterans.

"It relies on optimistic third-party collections, accounting gimmicks and punitive and totally unrealistic management efficiencies," he said.

With the government also proposing cuts in Medicaid, if Bush's budget passes, "many veterans would have nowhere else to turn," Fuller said.

Rep. Lane Evans, D-Ill., a Vietnam veteran and the senior Democrat on the House Veterans Affairs Committee, helped beat back user fees on veterans in the past. He is concerned that the fight against imposing fees on them is growing more difficult. He argues that not only are current veterans not getting sufficient help, but the department also is unready for a wave of new problems faced by those now serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Anthony Principi, Veterans Affairs secretary during Bush's first term, told reporters recently that the nation was simply not spending enough on its veterans. Principi noted that nearly one in five soldiers returning from Iraq or Afghanistan is suffering from mental health problems because of urban warfare's stresses.

He said the nation has not dealt with that or the fact that, because of better battlefield medical care, many soldiers who once would have died are returning home maimed -- having lost limbs, sight or hearing -- or are having difficulty readapting to civilian life.

Another problem that concerns many is the increase in battlefield chemicals that may be contributing to an apparent increase in non-Hodgkins lymphoma and Lou Gehrig's disease.

Principi is not popular with many veterans, however, because he acted while secretary to rule that many of them are no longer eligible for health care from the VA. Because thousands of veterans were waiting an average of 38 days (and a quarter of them waited two months) for appointments at the department's hospitals and 856 out-patient clinics, Principi rationed care in favor of the less well-off and disabled. That meant thousands were shut out of the system. Even Principi's deputy, Gordon Mansfield, injured in Vietnam, was turned away from six overbooked VA centers.

Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, who has served on the House Veterans Affairs Committee for much of her more than two decades in Congress and who sponsored a bill that led to erecting the World War II Memorial in Washington, said her reading of the president's budget shows that it would fall $15 billion below what is needed for veterans over the next five years.

"So how are we going to care for all those new veterans with serious injuries coming home?" she asked. "For nursing homes, they cut $351 million. They [the administration] would eliminate state grants and would serve 24,000 fewer patients. Only those who are highly disabled will be served.

"The construction budget would provide only half the funds that are needed," she said. "We should care for our veterans as a condition of service. They earned it. But we're not keeping our promise, not under this budget."

The administration has asserted that annual spending for veterans' services has gone up more than 300 percent since 1980, to $65 billion this year, and that in an age of mounting deficits such growth is unsustainable.

But some Republicans as well as Democrats were dismayed by the president's budget request. Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, said the amount requested would not even keep pace with the current level of services, let alone improve them, keep up with inflation or help returning soldiers from the Middle East.

White Oak's Casey, who knows a lot of veterans, says most of them think they have lost benefits in recent years. He said he is convinced that America as a nation is showing less and less gratitude toward its veterans and is less determined to keep its promise to make certain that veterans get good care.

"It's par for the course," Casey lamented. "After the war is over, our government forgets about the veterans."


Through documentary, woman reconnects with brother killed in Vietnam

Thursday, February 10, 2005
By Bob Batz Jr., Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Her brother, Jimmy Cryster, died in Vietnam on Nov. 14, 1967. He was 20. The South Side family buried his body in a soldiers' plot at Hazelwood's Calvary Cemetery and had to move on.

But 3-1/2 decades later, as Barbara Fullen stood at a Kentucky airstrip watching a restored Huey helicopter WHOP-WHOP-WHOP in for a landing, she wondered if, just maybe, this were some kind of surprise set up just for her. Wondered if, somehow, her brother were on board and coming to greet her while the video cameras rolled.

For the first time, she understood her mother's hope every time soldiers came home on TV.

Jimmy, of course, was not on this helicopter.

But the pilot was the same one who was flying a similar chopper the day her brother was shot on it. As Fullen climbed aboard, her brother's commanding officer, from his First of the Ninth Cavalry B Troop "Blues" infantry, sat beside her and held her hand.

And when the chopper lifted off for a brief flight, so did Fullen's heart. Despite going in terrified of heights, she felt calm. She felt her brother.

"It felt like I was with him again," she recalls.

That uplifting experience is part of a documentary, "In the Shadow of the Blade," that airs from 8 to 10 tonight on the new Military Channel (Channel 112 on Comcast; Channel 106 on Adelphia). It will be repeated, including from 6 to 8 p.m. Sunday.

Independent Arrowhead Film & Video of Austin, Texas, premiered the film on Veterans Day 2003. It since has played in numerous places but not Pittsburgh, although it is available on DVD.

How Fullen became part of it has to do with a Post-Gazette story about a famous photo, taken by former Army photographer Howard C. Breedlove, that immortalized 1st Cavalry soldiers jumping off a UH-1 helicopter as it hovered over a mountaintop near Chu Lai on April 24, 1967. ("Local Vietnam vet represents era of '60s on postage stamp," July 21, 2000)

Though it still cannot be officially documented, Fullen and her family are among many who are sure Cryster is the radioman in the image, which was made into a U.S. postage stamp in 2000.

After the Post-Gazette story was published that year, Fullen found a veteran who knew her brother, and she wound up going to a reunion of Calvary soldiers at Fork Rucker, Ala.

That's where, while crying beside life-size diorama of the iconic troops-jumping-off-the-Huey scene at U.S. Army Aviation Museum, she was approached by Patrick Fries, who wanted to do a film on the helicopters.

She told him how her brother was in one when he was hit by sniper fire, and subsequently was flown in it to the hospital, where he died. Just seeing a Huey, she said, "breaks my heart."

Fries had to bring her on board, literally. What he calls some of the most important dialogue in the film is something she says about her brother during her chopper flight:

"Is this what he felt?"

Fries arranged for several veterans and family members, at locations in eight states, to fly in a refurbished Huey. The documentary celebrates their stories, as well as the helicopter that was a workhorse and lifeline for U.S. troops during the Vietnam War. The one in the film is now on permanent display in the Smithsonian Museum of American History.

Fries, the director and co-producer (with his wife, Cheryl), says Fullen was a crucial inspiration for the project, which won Best of Show at the 2004 WorldFest-Houston International Film Festival. "In a lot of ways, Barbara's story epitomizes everything that I had in mind."

For Fullen, who still lives in the South Side and works as payroll coordinator for Quest Diagnostics, this was a great experience, especially the chance to meet her brother's peers whom she'd thought were all dead.

She says the result is a "great memory of my brother." He was 19 when the family took him to the airport to go to war. She was 14. Her six children never had a chance to know him, but she says they've learned things about him from the film.

"Everybody will remember him now."

 


THE VA HAS ESTABLISHED A TOLL-FREE AGENT ORANGE HOTLINE.

   A national toll-free hotline to answer Vietnam and Gulf War veterans' questions about Agent Orange exposure, health care, and benefits.
   Call 1-800-8387. Speak directly to a VA representative Monday through Friday from 8:00 am. to 4:00 PM. Central Time. A 24-hour automated system permits you to have information sent or you can listen to recorded information about Agent Orange exposure, VA benefits, health care, and disability compensation.
   The VA expects a great deal of interest because of a new policy that allows Vietnam veterans with adult-onset (TypeII) diabetes to receive disability compensation.
   The VA has also expanded registry to Veterans who served in Korea during 1968 and 1969, when the herbicide was used near the Demilitarized Zone. 

   Plans to include veterans who believe they were exposed to the herbicide at Fort Drum, NY, and other areas where veterans were exposed during manufacture, testing or transport is to be interdicted by Congressman Lane Evans of Illinois. From: Gary D. Harrington


Dick McCorrison.

I just received this and wanted to pass it on.
 
PROVIDE PHOTOS FOR VIET NAM VETERAN’S MEMORIAL

The virtual Wall  (http://www.thevirtualwall.org/),  the online version of The Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. would like to match a photo with everyone of the 58,226 names on the memorial.

Put A Face With A Name, a campaign sponsored by Kinko’s, is making this permanent digital photo collection possible.  From  Sept 12 thru Veteran’s Day, (Nov 11) 2001 only, all Kinko’s stores will offer free computer and scanning time with step-by-step instructions on how to scan and up-load an image to The Virtual Wall.

For more information, contact: Alan Greilsamer, Director of Communications, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 1023 15th Street, Second Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: (202) 393-0090, Ext. 19.  FAX: 202-393-0029.  E-mail: agreilsamer@vvmf.org


Received from Gary Harrington
Statistics about the Vietnam War

"No event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War. It was misreported then, and it is misremembered now. Rarely have so many people been so wrong about so much. Never have the consequences of their misunderstanding been so tragic."[Nixon] The Vietnam War has been the subject of thousands of newspaper and magazine articles, hundreds of books, and scores of movies and television documentaries. The great majority of these efforts have erroneously portrayed many myths about the Vietnam War as being facts. (Nixon Library)

Myth: Most American soldiers were addicted to drugs, guilt-ridden about their role in the war, and deliberately used cruel and inhumane tactics.

The facts are:
91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served (Westmoreland papers)
74% said they would serve again even knowing the outcome (Westmoreland papers)
There is no difference in drug usage between Vietnam Veterans and non veterans of the same age group (from a Veterans Administration study) (Westmoreland papers)
Isolated atrocities committed by American soldiers produced torrents of outrage from antiwar critics and the news media while Communist atrocities were so common that they received hardly any attention at all. The United States sought to minimize and prevent attacks on civilians while North Vietnam made attacks on civilians a centerpiece of its strategy. Americans who deliberately killed civilians received prison sentences while Communists who did so received commendations. From 1957 to 1973, the National Liberation Front assassinated 36,725 South Vietnamese and abducted another 58,499. The death squads focused on leaders at the village level and on anyone who improved the lives of the peasants such as medical personnel, social workers, and schoolteachers. (Nixon Library)Atrocities - every war has atrocities. War is brutal and not fair. Innocent people get killed.
Vietnam Veterans are less likely to be in prison - only 1/2 of one percent of Vietnam Veterans have been jailed for crimes. (Westmoreland papers)
97% were discharged under honorable conditions; the same percentage of honorable discharges as ten years prior to Vietnam (Westmoreland papers)
85% of Vietnam Veterans made a successful transition to civilian life.(McCaffrey Papers)
Vietnam veterans' personal income exceeds that of our non-veteran age group by more than 18 percent. (McCaffrey Papers)
Vietnam veterans have a lower unemployment rate than our non-vet age group. (McCaffrey Papers)
87% of the American people hold Vietnam Vets in high esteem.(McCaffrey Papers)
Myth: Most Vietnam veterans were drafted.
2/3 of the men who served in Vietnam were volunteers. 2/3 of the men who served in World War II were drafted. (Westmoreland papers)Approximately 70% of those killed were volunteers.(McCaffrey Papers)

Myth: The media have reported that suicides among Vietnam veterans range from 50,000 to 100,000 - 6 to 11 times the non-Vietnam veteran population.

Mortality studies show that 9,000 is a better estimate. "The CDC Vietnam Experience Study Mortality Assessment showed that during the first 5 years after discharge, deaths from suicide were 1.7 times more likely among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans. After that initial post-service period, Vietnam veterans were no more likely to die from suicide than non-Vietnam veterans. In fact, after the 5-year post-service period, the rate of suicides is less in the Vietnam veterans' group." [Houk]
Myth: A disproportionate number of blacks were killed in the Vietnam War.
86% of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasians, 12.5% were black, 1.2% were other races. (CACF and (Westmoreland papers)
Sociologists Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler, in their recently published book "All That We Can Be," said they analyzed the claim that blacks were used like cannon fodder during Vietnam "and can report definitely that this charge is untrue. Black fatalities amounted to 12 percent of all Americans killed in Southeast Asia - a figure proportional to the number of blacks in the U.S. population at the time and slightly lower than the proportion of blacks in the Army at the close of the war." [All That We Can Be]

Myth: The war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.

Servicemen who went to Vietnam from well-to-do areas had a slightly elevated risk of dying because they were more likely to be pilots or infantry officers.
Vietnam Veterans were the best educated forces our nation had ever sent into combat. 79% had a high school education or better. (McCaffrey Papers)
 

Here are statistics from the Combat Area Casualty File (CACF) as of November 1993. The CACF is the basis for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial (The Wall):



Average age of 58,148 killed in Vietnam was 23.11 years. (Although 58,169 names are in the Nov. 93 database, only 58,148 have both event date and birth date. Event date is used instead of declared dead date for some of those who were listed as missing in action)(CACF)


Deaths          Average Age            Total     58,148          23.11 yearsEnlisted  50,274          22.37 yearsOfficers  6,598           28.43 yearsWarrants  1,276           24.73 yearsE1        525             20.34 years11B MOS   18,465          22.55 years
Five men killed in Vietnam were only 16 years old.[CACF]



The oldest man killed was 62 years old.[CACF]



11,465 KIAs were less than 20 years old.[CACF]



Myth: The average age of an infantryman fighting in Vietnam was 19.



Assuming KIAs accurately represented age groups serving in Vietnam, the average age of an infantryman (MOS 11B) serving in Vietnam to be 19 years old is a myth, it is actually 22. None of the enlisted grades have an average age of less than 20.  [CACF] The average man who fought in World War II was 26 years of age. (Westmoreland papers)

Myth: The domino theory was proved false.

The domino theory was accurate. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand stayed free of Communism because of the U.S. commitment to Vietnam. The Indonesians threw the Soviets out in 1966 because of America's commitment in Vietnam. Without that commitment, Communism would have swept all the way to the Malacca Straits that is south of Singapore and of great strategic importance to the free world. If you ask people who live in these countries that won the war in Vietnam, they have a different opinion from the American news media. The Vietnam War was the turning point for Communism.(Westmoreland papers)
Democracy Catching On
- In the wake of the Cold War, democracies are flourishing, with 179 of the world's 192 sovereign states (93%) now electing their legislators, according to the Geneva-based Inter-Parliamentary Union. In the last decade, 69 nations have held multi-party elections for the first time in their histories. Three of the five newest democracies are former Soviet republics: Belarus (where elections were first held in November 1995), Armenia (July 1995) and Kyrgyzstan (February 1995). And two are in Africa: Tanzania (October 1995) and Guinea (June 1995). [Parade Magazine]
 
Myth: The fighting in Vietnam was not as intense as in World War II.

The average infantryman in the South Pacific during World War II saw about 40 days of combat in four years. The average infantryman in Vietnam saw about 240 days of combat in one year thanks to the mobility of the helicopter.
One out of every 10 Americans who served in Vietnam was a casualty. 58,169 were killed and 304,000 wounded out of 2.59 million who served. Although the percent who died is similar to other wars, amputations or crippling wounds were 300 percent higher than in World War II. 75,000 Vietnam veterans are severely disabled. (McCaffrey Papers)
MEDEVAC helicopters flew nearly 500,000 missions. Over 900,000 patients were airlifted (nearly half were American). The average time lapse between wounding to hospitalization was less than one hour. As a result, less than one percent of all Americans wounded who survived the first 24 hours died. (VHPA Databases)
The helicopter provided unprecedented mobility. Without the helicopter it would have taken three times as many troops to secure the 800 mile border with Cambodia and Laos (the politicians thought the Geneva Conventions of 1954 and the Geneva Accords or 1962 would secure the border) (Westmoreland papers)
More helicopter facts:
Approximately 12,000 helicopters saw action in Vietnam (all services).  (VHPA Databases)
Army UH-1's totaled 7,531,955 flight hours in Vietnam between October 1966 and the end of 1975. (VHPA Databases)
Army AH-1G's totaled 1,038,969 flight hours in Vietnam. (VHPA Databases)
NOTE*  
[All That We Can Be] All That We Can Be by Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler
[CACF] (Combat Area Casualty File) November 1993. (The CACF is the basis for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, i.e. The Wall), Center for Electronic Records, National Archives, Washington, DC
[Houk] Testimony by Dr. Houk, Oversight on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, 14 July 1988 page 17, Hearing before the Committee on Veterans' Affairs United States Senate one hundredth Congress second session. Also "Estimating the Number of Suicides Among Vietnam Veterans" (Am J Psychiatry 147, 6 June 1990 pages 772-776)
[McCaffrey] Speech by Lt. Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, (reproduced in the Pentagram, June 4, 1993) assistant to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to Vietnam veterans and visitors gathered at "The Wall", Memorial Day 1993
[Parade Magazine] August 18, 1996 page 10.
[VHPA Databases] Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association Databases.
[Westmoreland] Speech by General William C. Westmoreland before the Third Annual Reunion of the Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association (VHPA) at the Washington, DC Hilton Hotel on July 5th, 1986 (reproduced in a Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association Historical Reference Directory Volume 2A)


VA NEWS
VA hospitals may close as focus shifts
Move to outpatient care is part of restructuring plan
By LAURA MECKLER
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON - Veterans hospitals in cities across the country could be closed as the Department of Veterans Affairs moves its focus to outpatient care and works to bring services closer to people who need them. The massive restructuring, being announced today, would touch every community where the VA operates, though decisions about specific cities and hospitals won't be made for more than a year. In some cities, hospitals are likely to be closed or operations scaled back; in others, new services will be added. Information about the fate of Mississippi's VA hospitals was not available Wednesday night. "This is not about the closure of facilities. It's about continuing the change in VA health care and changing it for the better," Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs Dr. Leo S. Mackay Jr. said in an interview. Decisions about where to cut and where to add will be made after analyses of demographics and services available at 163 hospitals and more than 1,000 clinics, nursing homes and other health care facilities. An independent, nine-member commission is to make recommendations to the VA secretary in August 2003. As with recommendations on military base closings, the secretary must accept or reject the plan as a whole, an attempt to minimize the politics surrounding the closing of sometimes cherished institutions. Some veterans are concerned that the VA may be dismantling an infrastructure that is part of the national homeland security plan. And they worry that some vets will lose access to care." While they keep saying they're improving services, they are drastically cutting services," said Bruce Parry, 55, of Veterans for Unification, a Chicago advocacy group. "The result will be the VA serves fewer veterans, and as people find it less attractive, they will have further excuses for shutting more down in the future." The national overhaul, recommended by government auditors in 1999, is aimed at shifting dollars away from aging, inefficient facilities in communities where the number of veterans is shrinking in order to provide modern medicine closer to where vets of the future will live. The 1999 audit, by the General Accounting Office, predicted that without change, the VA would wind up spending billions of dollars to operate unneeded buildings, with as much as one of every four VA health care dollars devoted to the maintenance and operation of facilities. It's easier said than done. In a pilot program in one region, the VA opted to cut inpatient service from a downtown Chicago hospital and expand services at other facilities. Veterans groups were outraged, and VA officials are pledging to consider their opinions upfront as the market analyses begin across the country. The GAO suggested that the greatest potential for savings was in 40 cities where there is more than one VA hospital. These hospitals have a significant number of empty beds and compete with one another to serve "rapidly declining veteran populations," auditors said. A officials declined to speculate as to which hospitals might close and said their goal is not to cut services but to redeploy them to areas where they are needed more. They emphasized that hospital beds are not needed for the VA's new emphasis on outpatient care, which follows a national shift spurred by better drugs and more outpatient surgeries. "We're looking to allocate our resources more efficiently, in ways that keep pace with the American medical system," Mackay said. The initial analyses will be done on a market-by-market and then a regional level, but in the end, Mackay said, dollars could shift from one part of the country to another. For example, he said, like the overall population, veterans have shifted from Northern cities such as Chicago, Detroit, Boston and New York to Sun Belt states such as Florida, Texas and Arizona. In Chicago, for instance, he said that the veterans population is expected to shrink from 77,000 to 43,000 over 10 years. "Those are the kind of demographic and geographic shifts we're trying to accommodate," he said. Veterans groups are skeptical. The American Legion worries that current health care needs, which are often not met by an overtaxed system, will be ignored in the face of restructuring, said Mark Regan, assistant director for program management. "We recognize the need for VA to do strategic planning to make effective use of their resources," he said. "The most important thing is for veterans to be involved in the process."
 

Contributed by : Gary Harrington
 


Hi Guys

Sorry it's been so long since I've written but a lot has been going on. I am now the Editor for the HIGHLANDER the official newsletter for the 15th Artillery Association. We have set our next reunion date for Sep. 11-14th 2003 at Fort Brag NC. I am also extending this newsletter to other Vietnam Veterans groups. So the information in it applies to us all.
It seems many veterans are now showing entrust in our service during this time and we are also looking up people we served with plus there is a lot of actively with memorials and remembrances of this era as well as service connected legislation on heath care issues like Agent Orange, the VA and disability pay.
I would like to start a mailing list for the 8th Artillery. So I can send a hard copy newsletter to each of you this would give you more insight into the going on with in the Vietnam Veterans community and I hope will inspire you to participate in it. I think you will find this rewarding.
Carl Johnson has been doing an outstanding job with our website and it has getting over 2000 hits already, this shows people are interested and our Brotherhood is growing. So please take some time to send me a mailing address and I'll get a copy of the newsletter out to you. Also please visit our 8th Artillery website and I have a website of my own that list things of entrust to Veterans. Both these website address are posted at the bottom of this page.
Thanks and please keep me informed of any activities that might be of entrust to Vietnam Veterans to are happening in your area.

Sincerity
Gary D. Harrington
7/8th Artillery Association
625 Woodward Ave.
Gulfport MS 39501
(228) 863-5455


U.S. Deploys Artillery to Afghanistan For 1st Time
 
Army to Use Six Howitzers To Protect Base in Kandahar

By Vernon Loeb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 10, 2002; Page A10

The U.S. military has deployed artillery to Afghanistan for the first time, giving ground forces the ability to counter mortar and rocket attacks by al Qaeda and Taliban fighters. A senior military official said the Army has deployed six 105mm howitzers at the main U.S. base in the southern city of Kandahar as part of an effort to bolster protection of the 8,000 American troops in the country.

The howitzers, equipped with counter-fire radar, enable U.S. forces to pinpoint the location of enemy mortar and rocket fire and respond with artillery shells. A spokesman for Central Command, which is overseeing the war, declined to comment on the reason for the deployment yesterday. It involves elements of the 82nd Airborne's 319th Field Artillery Regiment.

From the outset, the military has taken note of the Soviet military defeat in Afghanistan in the 1980s, when large numbers of Soviet forces were confined to garrison and harassed and attacked by Afghan mortar and rocket fire. In response, the Pentagon opted to keep the U.S. military presence in the country relatively small, one reason ground commanders did not bring artillery -- the heaviest component of any Army division -- into Afghanistan before now.

But faced with a volatile security situation -- a gunman tried to assassinate Afghan President Hamid Karzai last week on the same day a bomb killed 23 people in Kabul -- commanders realize that U.S. forces are going to be in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future at vulnerable bases.

Hundreds of U.S. troops launched a sweep yesterday through the mountains in eastern Afghanistan's Paktia province on the Pakistani border, searching for members of the al Qaeda network and Afghanistan's ousted Taliban militia.

Anthony H. Cordesman, a former Pentagon official who is a military and diplomatic analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said a debate is developing within the U.S. military between those who believe in continuing a hunt for al Qaeda and Taliban remnants, and those who believe the United States has reached a point of diminishing returns and should turn over security to Afghanistan's central government, regional leaders and an international peacekeeping force in Kabul.

But as long as the U.S. military has 8,000 troops in Afghanistan, Cordesman said, adding artillery to bolster force protection makes good sense. "This to me is a pragmatic gesture -- and it certainly does reflect the fact that things aren't perfectly secure," he said.

Michael E. O'Hanlon, a senior fellow and military analyst at the Brookings Institution, said al Qaeda fighters in Afghanistan have shown themselves adept at exploiting what little opportunities they have been given by U.S. forces. "If they are able to lob a shell at you and run, you can't call in air power quickly enough to go after them," O'Hanlon said. "The only way to deprive them of that is to be able to respond really fast, and artillery is very quick in its response time."

Barnett R. Rubin, a New York University expert on Afghanistan, said the Army's decision to send artillery to the country "validates" a belief he formed during a recent trip there that armed resistance to the U.S. military and the Karzai government is "becoming better organized and more effective."

"They can't gain any military victories," he said. "What they can do is harass U.S. troops more, in the hopes of producing more casualties, and they can engage in acts of terror -- either assassination attempts against key Afghan leaders, or acts of terrorism against Afghan civilians."

The addition of artillery, Rubin said, seems to be a natural response by a military that "sees itself as a war-fighting military, fighting a low-level counter-insurgency war."

"What I think is much more necessary is a reconfiguration of U.S. force structure and mission so it puts a much higher priority on promoting the security of the Afghan government and the Afghan people," he said. "Artillery doesn't do anything to increase the security of Afghans."

Retired Army Maj. Gen. Bob Scales, a former artillery commander in the 82nd Airborne, said 105mm howitzers would enable commanders to create a defensive "arc," with a radius of eight to 10 miles, around U.S. bases. With counter-mortar radar, Scales said, "you can have rounds going back at the [enemy] mortar before that [incoming] round actually lands on you."

Beyond force protection, retired Army Col. Robert Killebrew said the addition of artillery to Afghanistan is also a clear sign that ground commanders in the 82nd Airborne believed the Central Command erred in a major offensive against al Qaeda in March when it sent elements from the 10th Mountain and 101st Airborne divisions into the eastern mountains without artillery support.

"You don't deploy infantry without some kind of fire support," Killebrew said. "The mortar duels that they got involved in up on the ridges there were a clear signal that someone had forgotten that lesson. Air support wasn't very effective in suppressing those [enemy] mortars."


Subject: Concurrent receipt: military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation.

 

To: The Honorable President George W. Bush,

The House and Senate Armed Services Committees are meeting in conference to write the final version of the National Defense Authorization Act.

One of the provisions of that legislation would correct the bar against concurrent receipt of military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation.

The House version of the National Defense Authorization Act would give military retirees who are 60 percent disabled or worse their full retirement pay and full disability compensation by 2007.

The Senate version of the National Defense Authorization Act would establish total concurrent receipt and extend full retirement pay to disabled veterans without restriction.

The President's Office of Management and Budget recommends that the President veto the National Defense Authorization Act if the final bill changes the current law denying disabled military retirees their earned retirement and DVA disability compensation (AKA: concurrent receipt).

As a disabled combat veteran of the Viet Nam conflict, a retired military member with service from 1968 to 1998, a life member of the DAV, VFW, American Legion and AMVETS and a County Veterans Service Officer for to the last 25 years I consider any action to deny our countries disabled veterans any part of their earned retirement benefits for their longevity of service an act of bureaucratic insensitivity that insults all that we have fought for and stand for as a nation.

I can imagine no argument that could justify the federal government denying professional members of the armed forces the retirement that they have earned simply because they are wounded, diseased or injured while serving the nation they have taken an oath to defend and protect.

No other profession or vocation, private or government, penalizes disabled veterans by reducing their retirement by the amount of the compensation that they are entitled to as a result of disabilities they have incurred in the line of duty to this country.

Please do not further scar the act of patriotism and service to our country by a veto of this attempt to justify a long time bar of concurrent receipt of military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation.

Yours in service,

John H. Kitts
SFC, USA, RETIRED
County Veterans Service Officer

Bugles with Knobs 

Thanks to what the US Department of Defense calls "advancements in digital audio technology", America's military funerals will soon sound much better. Aficionados of Westerns should recognise the plaintive strains of Taps, the bugle call played at sunset on army posts, and at military funerals as well. But the armed forces don't have enough real buglers to cover the thousands of veterans' funerals each year, and playing a recording of Taps on a portable stereo is felt to lack dignity. So the DoD has collaborated with industry to create a "ceremonial bugle".

All a soldier in the honour guard has to do is push a button and hold the bugle to his or her lips, and a splendid rendition of Taps (recorded live at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day, 1999) will issue forth.

The DoD, which is now testing 50 of the digital bugles, says that as well as superior sound, they will offer the "dignified visual" of a real person holding what looks like a real instrument to their lips - even if they can't play a note without electronic assistance

From Gary Harrington


Hello Carl,
             WELCOME HOME!
             You have a few photo's and collected items of mine on your 
web-site. You and all Vietnam veterans are welcome to use them. I would like 
you to add a courtesy to items. Bill Van Eck C-2/32, Proud Americans.
               You visited Fort Sill last year, at the Fort Sill Museum you 
saw a 175mm M-107 model called "proud AMERICAN". You have photo's of the same 
tube on your web-site. "proud AMERICAN' was one of the first twelve 175mm 
guns of 2nd Battalion 32 Artillery to be off loaded in Vietnam in November 
1965.
                "proud AMERICAN" is very special to the PROUD AMERICAN 
ASSOCIATION and to all Artillerymen who served on the big guns in Vietnam. 
"proud AMERICAN" is the only tube of any caliber to survive and come back to 
the United States. It was one of the first tubes changed in Vietnam, its 
replacement was called "ANGEL", ANGEL proved to be a bad name blowing up, on 
a fire mission killing a few of its crew and wounding others.
                   Somehow the barrel "proud AMERICAN" was sent back to the 
United States perhaps for core samples of the medal its made of. The barrel 
was made in the "CHAMBERS Works", Scranton Pa. The 36ft. barrel, 11,400 lb  
without beach block, barrel landed up on the bottom of a barrel rack rusting 
away at Aberdeen Proving Grounds. With the help of PROUD AMERICAN ASSOCIATION 
we took on the Aberdeen Museum and US Army writing letters to Congressmen. 
and we won!
              We got permission to move the barrel back to Fort Sill Museum. 
Fort Sill had a M-110 mounted chassis they gave up. The museum and US Army 
remounted the barrel in less then 3 weeks for our reunion in May 2001.
                 How do we know its one of a kind, Dr. William Atwater, 
Aberdeen Proving Grounds Museum Director, (HISTORY CHANNEL) fame. can't find 
another barrel of any caliber that was returned to the US.
                   You see Dr. Atwater is a ex-WIA, "MARINES" vet and he 
would of rubbed in in, if there was another barrel or tube in the MARINES.
                   Look up our web-site 
www.proudamericans.homestead.com/proudamericans.html
 or search your computer look up 2nd Battalion 32nd Artillery, or Proud 
Americans
                                                                    Take Care!
                                                                     Bill Van 
Eck C-2/32 1964-1966 



This Site Last Updated : Saturday, February 16, 2008 05:01 PM
Copyright©2001 by Carl Johnson
C & N Enterprises